Child Abuse and Neglect the approach taken by the social worker in Brandon’s case – Savvy Essay Writers | savvyessaywriters.net
Humanities
Child Abuse and Neglect the approach taken by the social worker in Brandon’s case – Savvy Essay Writers | savvyessaywriters.net
Place your order now – Savvy Essay Writers
Physical, emotional, and sexual abuse can have a devastating impact on a child and his or her family members. Social workers need to understand how to recognize and respond to cases of abuse expertly and efficiently. With an empathetic and helpful social worker, victims/survivors of abuse can take their first step onto the long road toward healing. For this Assignment, read the case study Working With Survivors of Sexual Abuse and Trauma: The Case of Brandon and then consider what you would do if you were a social worker and had to report a parent of suspected child abuse.
Submit a 2- to 4-page paper in which you review the approach taken by the social worker in Brandon’s case. Identify how the social worker might have used the ecological model to understand Brandon’s situation based on a person-in-environment perspective. Explain the use of the ecological model in this case on micro, mezzo, and macro levels. Describe strengths the social worker may have missed in assessing Brandon and his mother. Review the challenges that the social worker identifies and explain the impact the abuse could have had on Brandon had his strengths not been identified and addressed. Please use the Learning Resources to support your answer.
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Responsiveness to Directions |
27 (27%) – 30 (30%) Assignment fully addresses all instruction prompts. |
24 (24%) – 26.97 (26.97%) Assignment addresses most of the instruction prompts; however, one or more prompts may have been insufficiently addressed. |
21 (21%) – 23.97 (23.97%) Assignment addresses some of the instructions prompts, but may have missed several prompts or did not sufficiently address the majority of prompts. |
0 (0%) – 20.97 (20.97%) Assignment does not address the majority of instruction prompts and/or insufficiently addresses all instruction prompts. |
| Content |
36 (36%) – 40 (40%) Paper demonstrates an excellent understanding of all of the concepts and key points presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Paper provides significant detail including multiple relevant examples, evidence from the readings and other sources, and discerning ideas. Paper demonstrates exemplary critical thought. |
32 (32%) – 35.96 (35.96%) Paper demonstrates a good understanding of most of the concepts and key points presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Paper includes moderate detail, evidence from the readings, and discerning ideas. Paper demonstrates good critical thought. |
28 (28%) – 31.96 (31.96%) Paper demonstrates a fair understanding of the concepts and key points as presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Paper may be lacking in detail and specificity and/or may not include sufficient pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings. Paper demonstrates some critical thought. |
0 (0%) – 27.96 (27.96%) Paper demonstrates poor understanding of the concepts and key points of the text(s) and Learning Resources. Paper is missing detail and specificity and/or does not include any pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings. Paper demonstrates poor critical thought. |
| Writing |
27 (27%) – 30 (30%) Assignment is well organized, uses scholarly tone, follows APA style, uses original writing and proper paraphrasing, contains very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and is fully consistent with graduate level writing style. Assignment contains multiple, appropriate and exemplary sources expected/required for the assignment. |
24 (24%) – 26.97 (26.97%) Assignment is mostly consistent with graduate level writing style. Assignment may have some small or infrequent organization, scholarly tone, or APA style issues, and/or may contain a few writing and spelling errors, and/or somewhat less than the expected number of or type of sources. |
21 (21%) – 23.97 (23.97%) Assignment is somewhat below graduate level writing style, with multiple smaller or a few major problems. Assignment may be lacking in organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and/or contain many writing and/or spelling errors, or shows moderate reliance on quoting vs. original writing and paraphrasing. Assignment may contain inferior resources (number or quality). |
0 (0%) – 20.97 (20.97%) Assignment is well below graduate level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and writing, or relies excessively on quoting. Assignment may contain few or no quality resources. |
PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW
Savvy Essay Writers
